Back to Blog Overview

🛡️ How to Pass AWS Marketplace's IAM Policy Checks Using Non-Restrictive Conditions

19.12.2025
When publishing an application to the AWS Marketplace, you're required to follow strict IAM best practices. One of the most common stumbling blocks? The automated IAM policy review that flags your role for not using resource-level or conditional permissions on actions like s3:PutObject or dynamodb:PutItem.

Even if your policy already limits access to specific resources (like a single bucket or table), the automatic check may still fail unless you also add condition keys—even when those conditions don’t logically apply to your use case.

So how do you pass these checks without breaking functionality?

Let’s walk through the trick.

🚫 The Problem

Let’s say your Lambda function needs to:

• Upload files to an S3 bucket (with s3:PutObject)
• Write items to a DynamoDB table (with dynamodb:PutItem and dynamodb:DeleteItem)

You scope your policy to only allow access to:

• Your specific S3 bucket/object path: arn:aws:s3:::my-bucket/*
• Your specific DynamoDB table: arn:aws:dynamodb:us-east-1:123456789012:table/MyTable

But you still get these errors:

"For each following action: s3:PutObject, please see this IAM documentation for available resources and condition keys..."

"For each following action: dynamodb:PutItem, dynamodb:DeleteItem..."

✅ The Solution: Add Harmless Condition Keys

To pass the check, add non-restrictive condition keys that satisfy the validator without impacting your logic.

✅ For S3 PutObject

Add this condition:

"Condition": {   "StringEqualsIfExists": {     "s3:x-amz-acl": "private"   } } 

• ✅ It only applies if the x-amz-acl header is present.
• ✅ It allows the default case (no header) and the most secure value (private).

✅ For DynamoDB PutItem, DeleteItem, UpdateItem

Add this condition:

"Condition": {   "StringEqualsIfExists": {     "dynamodb:ReturnValues": "NONE"   } } 

• ✅ ReturnValues: NONE is the default.
• ✅ StringEqualsIfExists means it won't block requests that omit the parameter.

🧪 Full Example (YAML)

- Effect: Allow   Action: s3:PutObject   Resource: arn:aws:s3:::my-bucket/*   Condition:     StringEqualsIfExists:       s3:x-amz-acl: "private"  - Effect: Allow   Action:     - dynamodb:PutItem     - dynamodb:DeleteItem     - dynamodb:UpdateItem   Resource: arn:aws:dynamodb:us-east-1:123456789012:table/MyTable   Condition:     StringEqualsIfExists:       dynamodb:ReturnValues: "NONE" 

🧠 Why This Works

These conditions meet AWS’s policy validation engine requirements because:

• You're using valid condition keys
• You aren’t loosening permissions
• And most importantly: you’re not blocking valid traffic

✅ TL;DR

If you're stuck on IAM policy errors when submitting to AWS Marketplace, try these:

ActionCondition Key (Safe)s3:PutObjects3:x-amz-acl = "private"dynamodb:*Itemdynamodb:ReturnValues = "NONE"

Add them with StringEqualsIfExists, and you’re good to go.